Quickish note about bots and leverage

Read some comments on CT recently that alarmed me. Novice bot subscribers going wild with absurd amounts of arbitrary leverage. To wit; here's the underwater plot + returns for a popular bot on a popular platform (2 years' live data):
And here's the same trades using the somewhat confused settings of 90% equity with "3x leverage" relayed to me by an actual user of this system:

n.b. I'm inferring "leverage" is being applied like a slot machine multiplier, does seem to be the case tho I could be wrong.
So yeah, 3x lev.... sick returns bro, did you hold all through that -80% account drawdown bro?

I wager most users would throw in the towel and take the L, long before recovery.

Please

Don't

Do This!

🥶
let's shuffle the trades and run 1,000 simulations with those crazy settings, here's what that looks like:
We can see that in 970 of the 1000 simulations (97%), it blew *at least* half of your account.

Risk of Ruin: Inevitable đź’Ż

If you see anyone doing this please try and talk them down off the ledge.

(this simulation by no means gospel, but it's a tool to get a handle on things)
Using the same tool, we can iteratively figure out a better (smaller) size that we'd be more comfortable trading with

Suggest that using 50% size (1x lev) we're unlikely to encounter drawdown worse than -30%
Finally, feeding the sensible size back into that bot's trades
Assumptions...
trading USDT margined (linear) contract
fees: 0.06% (FTX, taker both sides)
slippage: random between ±2.5 and ±7.5 USD
bots do work as long as they're traded consistently, are given sufficient time, are not too crowded and the user isn't greedy or impatient
You can follow @azidynamics.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.